How will unsustainable US debt end?

Share Button

November 30, 2025 — US debt in the hand of the public now stands at 99 % of GDP.  The Congressional Budget Office [CBO] projects that it will reach 107% of GDP by 2027, thereby surpassing the longstanding record from the end of World War II.  The projections of the ratio of debt to GDP show an ever-upward path, the definition of unsustainability.

Discussions of the US national debt are often launched via an old quote from Herb Stein (CEA Chair under Nixon): “If something cannot go on forever, it will stop.”  But what form will the stop take?  There are six ways that an unsustainable debt path can come to an end: faster economic growth, lower interest rates, default, inflation, financial repression, and fiscal austerity.  In the US case, one is tempted to scratch all six off the list, one by one.  But that would leave us in violation of Stein’s Law. read more

Share Button

Abundance

Share Button

November 2, 2025 —  In search of an alternative vision to MAGA that might appeal to common-sense working Americans, some Democrats have rallied around the word “abundance.”  That is the title of a recent book by Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson, touted as a once-in-a-generation, paradigm-shifting revelation.

To begin, let me say that Ezra Klein is one of my favorite columnists and podcasters.

To the extent that abundance can be used as an effective political slogan, I am all ears.  In its favor, “abundance” is short enough to fit onto a bumper sticker, the word is neither too common in speech nor too uncommon, and it sounds like something we should all want.  It could fulfill the purpose of Democrats admitting past mistakes, which at this point is de rigueur if they are to develop an effective political strategy.  But abundance seems to me an arrow that is not particularly well-aimed. read more

Share Button

Do Voters Pursue Their Economic Self-Interest?

Share Button

September 29, 2025 — As US President Donald Trump goes further and further off the rails in his demolition of long-standing rules and norms, it remains puzzling why so many Americans voted for him and continue to support him.  It is especially puzzling why so many lower and middle-income Americans support him, since his policies tend to their economic disadvantage.  Cutting federal spending on Medicaid and many other government services while simultaneously extending massive tax cuts for high-income households, does not sound crowd-pleasing populism.  But perhaps this is only puzzling to economists. read more

Share Button